Thursday, February 28, 2019

Sea Limited (SE) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Sea Limited  (NYSE:SE)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 26, 2019, 7:00 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Sea Limited Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Results Conference Call. (Operator Instructions) And please note that today's event is being recorded.

And I would now like to turn the conference over to Howard Soh. Please go ahead.

Howard Soh -- Director of Corporate Development and Strategy

Thank you very much. Good morning, and good evening, everyone, and welcome to Sea's 2018 fourth quarter earnings conference call. I'm Howard Soh, Director of Corporate Development and Strategy at Sea.

Before we continue, I would like to remind you that we may make forward-looking statements, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and may not be realized in the future for various reasons as stated in our press release.

Also, this call includes discussion of certain non-GAAP financial measures such as adjusted revenue, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss. We believe these measures can enhance our investors' understanding of actual cash flows of our major businesses when used as a complement to our GAAP disclosures. For a discussion of the use of non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliation with the closest GAAP measures, please refer to the section on non-GAAP financial measures in our press release.

Let me begin by introducing the management team on the call. We have our Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer, Forrest Li; our Group Chief Financial Officer, Tony Hou, and our Group General Counsel, Yanjun Wang. Forrest and Tony will share strategy and business updates, operating highlights and financial performance for the quarter. This will be followed by a Q&A session, in which we welcome any questions you have.

With that, let me turn the call over to Forrest.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Howard. Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. I'm very pleased to announce that we closed out 2018 well ahead of our ambitious target. Building on our strong results in the fourth quarter we exceeded the high end of each of the projections we provided in our latest guidance last year.

Let me start by quoting our Garena success. Our digital entertainment adjusted revenue for the full year of 2018 reached $661 million exceeding the high end of our guidance by $41 million. In the fourth quarter, we recorded adjusted revenue of $231.4 million, up 50% from the third quarter, and it is expected to show further robust growth in the first quarter of 2018. And our adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter rose to 45.5% compared to 37.2% for the previous quarter. It is expected to improve further in the first quarter of 2019.

We believe Garena's sustained strong performance underlies our success in executing our core strategy to materially expand our digital entertainment business from being a PC-focused regional publisher to a global developer and the publisher, with a core strength in mobile games, and a key focus on emerging markets which greatly expands our total addressable market size. Free Fire is now one of the most popular battle royale game in the work. We recently hit a new record high of more that 350 million registered users and more that 40 million peak daily active users.

According to App Annie, for the full year of 2018 Free Fire was the fourth most downloaded mobile game in the world across Apple App Store and the Google Play Store combined. It has also hit the milestone of recording more than 100 million monthly active users. Importantly, we are also making excellent progress on monetizing Free Fire's massive and highly active user base and this is reflected in our adjusted revenue growth and EBITDA margin improvement.

One of the crucial factors in Free Fire's growth is the fast growing and engaged global community of players. Building on this strong community sentiment from late 2018, we have been rolling out the Free Fire World Cup, the global eSports tournament. We believe this global tournament will help to drive sustained excitement and solidify Free Fire position as one of the leading games in the genre globally.

As Free Fire's success has demonstrated, we believe that Garena has built a unique set of capabilities in developing and the publishing global hit games that also address the needs of gamers in faster growth emerging markets. We have a deep understanding of the unique profiles and the needs of gamers in such market and unrivalled access to data and insights about these gamers because of our Q2 user base. We are also deeply rooted in this market with strong local operations capabilities and not only in our core markets, but also in other major markets like Latin America.

More importantly, with our strong technology and execution capabilities, we are able to quickly identify and take advantage of market opportunities. We now have a strong and growing game development team. With more than 200 developers in our games studio in Shanghai, we are working on enhancing Free Fire and on building out our self developed games pipeline.

Free Fire is a great example of how quickly we are able to identify and tap into new market opportunities. It was one of the first mobile battle royale games to come to market. At the same time, our game publishing business continues to grow from strength to strength, as global IP holders recognize our unrivaled ability to tap into the faster growing game communities in our region.

For instance we have begun rolling out Speed Drifters, as the first the game that we are publishing under our right of first refusal arrangement with Tencent that we announced last quarter. And I'm pleased to say that we have agreed with PUBG Corporation to bring into our key markets in Southeast Asia PUBG Light, a PC game adapt from their global hit game PUBG tailored for our region.

Looking to the year ahead, we intend to continue to drive growth in our digital entertainment business as we continue to build out a world-class in-house game development arm and strengthening our publishing capability. Turning to e-commerce our goals for Shopee in 2018 were to continue to strengthen its market leadership position across its key markets, with increasing efficiency and to ramp up monetization. And I'm pleased to say that we have delivered on all fronts.

E-commerce GMV for the fourth quarter was $3.4 billion, representing 27% growth on the $2.7 billion in the third quarter. During the quarter we recorded 206.9 million orders up 31% from the third quarter. Meanwhile during the 24 hours of our Double 11 sales in 2018, we see the new record for Shopee of over 11 million orders in a single day. And just one month later, during our double 12 sale, we broke that again, recording over 12 million orders in 24 hours on December 12. Out of those 12 million orders approximately 5.4 million came from our largest market, Indonesia. Shopee's continuing certification of leadership in Indonesia is a powerful demonstration of the strong flywheel (ph) effect it enjoys.

In the fourth quarter, Shopee recorded total orders of 83.8 million or a daily average of 0.9 million in Indonesia, further extending its leadership as the largest e-commerce platform here. For the full year of 2018, Shopee achieved $10.3 billion in GMV which was above the high end of the recent guidance of $9.7 billion we provided in the third quarter. Breaking $10 billion in annual GMV, was an important milestone for Shopee and an impressive achievement for platform that is just three years sold. You can see the sustained improvement in the efficiency of our sales and the marketing spend.

In the fourth quarter, sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of GMV, fell once again to 5.4%, down from 5.7% last quarter and 8.5% for the same period a year ago. In fact, shipping subsidies declined in absolute dollar term in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter. It is important to note that Shopee achieved this sustained improvement in marketing efficiency while its GMV grew by 27% and orders grew by 31% quarter-on-quarter, demonstrating that we are able to both grow our platform while increasing efficiency at the same time.

We are able to do this, because of the durable leadership position we have achieved. We expect sales and marketing expenses to start trending down in absolute dollar terms this year. As we continue to scale with greater efficiency, benefit from strong organic user growth and solidify our market leadership in the region.

On the monetization front, e-commerce adjusted revenue grew over 16 times year-on-year to $290.7 million for 2018, as we ramped up our monetization efforts during the year. And in the fourth quarter, adjusted revenue grew more than 78% compared to the third quarter to $126.9 million. Moreover, we expect Shopee to record a positive quarterly adjusted EBITDA before allocation of the headquarters' common expenses for the first time in the first quarter of 2018 in Taiwan.

We see the same dynamics around network effects that accrued to Clear Leader (ph) in a two sided marketplace model starting to play out in our other markets. Shopee's ability to grow rapidly over a short period of time to achieve regional market leadership is a testament to its successful strategy and ability to execute that strategy efficiently and effectively. Shopee has been focusing on building a mobile-centric, socially engaging marketplace with emphasis on high margin products from a highly diverse seller base.

In addition to that, Shopee has also combined its marketplace offering with integrated payments, logistics infrastructure and a comprehensive set of services. And looking to the year ahead, we believe this strategic focus and our proven track record of successfully executing on our strategies will continue to drive growth at Shopee. In 2019, we intend to focus on growing with efficiency while looking to further ramp up monetization through deeper engagement with our sellers and buyers.

To sum up, I'm very proud of our performance in the fourth quarter and the full year of 2018. Across the business 2018 was a transformative year as Shopee extended its lead in e-commerce and Garena emerged as a leading global game developer and the publisher. We enter into 2019 in a stronger position than ever before poised for growth on all fronts. We are hugely excited for the year ahead and have once again set ambitious growth targets for ourselves as reflected in our guidance for 2019.

With that, I will invite Tony to share more about the financials.

Tony Hou -- Group Chief Financial Officer

Thank you. Forrest, and thanks to everyone for joining the call. We have included detailed quarterly financial schedules together with the corresponding management analysis in today's press release. So I'll focus my comments on the key financial metrics. For Sea, overall, our fourth quarter total adjusted revenue was $389.3 million, an increase of 137% year-on-year and 60% quarter-on-quarter.

This was mainly driven by the growth of our digital entertainment business, especially for our self developed game, Free Fire and our continuous monetization efforts in our e-commerce business in the past quarters. Digital entertainment adjusted revenue was $231.4 million, an increase of 63% year-on-year and 60% quarter-on-quarter. The growth was primarily driven by the enlarged user base and the improvement in the monetization of our portfolio games, especially Free Fire.

Digital entertainment adjusted EBITDA was $105.2 million, doubled year-on-year and an increase of 96% quarter-on-quarter, thanks to the strong topline growth and our self developed game accounting for an increased share of revenue.

E-commerce adjusted revenue was $126.9 million, up 78% quarter-on-quarter from the third quarter of 2018. Of this $126.9 million in adjusted revenue, marketplace revenue was $87.6 million, up 884% year-on-year and 74% quarter-on-quarter, while product revenue was $39.3 million, up 9,725% year-on-year and 88% for quarter-on-quarter. E-commerce adjusted EBITDA loss was $277.5 million as we continued our investment to fully capture the market opportunity in the region.

We will continue driving the high quality growth by serving users' needs better and improving the operational efficiency. Digital Financial Services adjusted revenue was $3.1 million, a decrease of 25% year-on-year from $4.1 million in the first quarter of last year as we focused our efforts on strengthening the infrastructure to support our existing platforms. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $9.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 compared to a loss of $7.6 million in the same period of 2017.

Returning to our consolidated numbers, we recognized a net non-operating income of $53 million in the fourth quarter of 2018. This was primarily due to a fair value accounting driven valuation gain of $61.2 million from the convertible notes, we issued before our IPO. We had a net income tax expense of $3 million in the fourth quarter of 2018, which was primarily due to corporate income tax and withholding tax recognized in our digital entertainment segment.

Finally, our adjusted net loss, which is net loss adjusted to exclude share-based compensation expenses and the fair value change for the pre-IPO convertible notes was $321.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2018, as compared to $199.6 million for the same period in 2017.

I will conclude with our guidance for the full year of 2019. We currently expect digital entertainment adjusted revenue to be between $1.2 billion to $1.3 billion, representing year-on-year growth of 82% to 97%. In addition, we expect e-commerce adjusted revenue for the full year of 2019 to be between $630 million and $660 million, representing year-on-year growth of 117% to 127%.

With that let me turn the call back to Howard.

Howard Soh -- Director of Corporate Development and Strategy

Thank you, Forrest and Tony. We are now ready to open the call for questions. Operator please proceed.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. And we will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) And the first questioner today will be Miang Chuen Koh with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Miang Chuen Koh -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Hi, good morning. Congrats on the strong results. Few questions from me, for games, the pay (ph) ratio was up significantly, Q-over-Q. I presume this is mainly Free Fire but has the monetization started already at the end of second quarter, why is there such a big jump I guess in 4Q?

And for games as well, in terms of your FY19 revenue guidance, is the expected growth just coming from Free Fire and Speed Drifters, or does it include other new games from Tencent or even your own? And then a couple of question our e-commerce if I may as well -- sorry. So the cost of services for e-commerce continues to rise quite a bit more than revenues? I know there are some explanation in the press release on the cost items that contribute to that.

However, could there be more color on that? Maybe more specifics on other perhaps cost increases there or cost buckets that we should be aware of? And when can we see revenues trend more in line with the increase in cost of services as well? And then finally on the e-commerce revenue guidance for FY19, is the Y-o-Y growth expected to come more from the higher take rate or from GMV increase? Thank you.

Howard Soh -- Director of Corporate Development and Strategy

Sure. Thanks for all your questions. Let me start from the first one, on the game ratio (ph), I think. So you talked about overall pay ratio for -- has blended upward, that's right. Yes, it is actually reflected a reflection of the fact that the pay ratio for Free Fire has gone up. You're right that we have started monetizing the game a bit earlier on, but recall that during the previous call, I actually mentioned that whenever we get a high potential game, our first protocol, our first duty is really to make sure that as many people as possible are playing the game.

Now that we have the numbers, and Forrest shared more than 350 million registered users over 100 million MAUs and peak day use of over 40 million. Now that we're in that position and we think that we are able to turn on the monetization little bit more strongly. So what you're seeing is that a lot of efforts in terms of our fourth quarter has really been focused in terms of converting free users becoming paying users. As a result that has affected the pay ratio and subsequently adjusted revenues for the fourth quarter.

If we think about the 2019 guidance on the Garena side of things, yes, it's true. It's actually quite robust in terms of where we think we're going to land in terms of the overall guidance being $1.2 billion to $1.3 billion in adjusted revenue potential for 2019. It is coming off the back of a couple of things. You mentioned like Free Fire, as well as some of our new titles like Speed Drifters. But it's really a reflection of reaping the dividends of a shift in our overall strategy.

When we set out several years ago we were primarily a PC-based pay pure publisher focus on Southeast Asia and Taiwan. And now we successfully made a transition toward being a lot more mobile centric from being a pure publisher to going into self development. And of course with the success of Free Fire that's really given us a passport to spread our wings beyond Southeast Asia and Taiwan to a lot of global emerging markets.

So access to places like Latin America where Free Fire was the top-ranked game in Brazil in 2018 by MAUs downloads and consumer spend, and the top five for each of these categories in Mexico and Argentina. Needless to say that really has great implications in terms of our total addressable market for the future.

I'll let Tony weigh in, in terms of the questions with regard to Shopee on the cost of services.

Tony Hou -- Group Chief Financial Officer

For the cost of services. Yes, you're right, it's mainly the volume driven thing. As you look at the cost component it is mainly our bank transaction fees and also the cause of value-add services like logistics services and as the volume ramping up the cost of sales also ramping up as well.

Miang Chuen Koh -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Finally, and sorry, do you mind running this true that last question, again as well in terms of like EC revenue guidance? Yes. So I'm just wondering whether the Y-o-Y growth in EC revenues, is it coming more from higher take rates that you expect or more from GMV increase, Y-o-Y?

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Yes. So we actually think that it's going to be a combination of both. GMV wise it's still going to continue to grow very, very robustly. At the same time we've also indicated that once we gain a good measure in terms of being the market leader, we can also look -- it's within our ability to start looking at monetization a bit more deeply and that's something that we've started to do already in the first quarter and you see continue to echo out throughout 2019. So come from a combination of commissions, as well as advertising as well value-added services.

Miang Chuen Koh -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Got it. Thank you.

Operator

And our next question today will be Alicia Yap with Citigroup. Please go ahead.

Alicia Yap -- Citigroup -- Analyst

Hi, good morning. Forrest, Tony, Howard. Congratulations on the strong quarter and also the strong guidance. I have some follow-up questions on the digital entertainment, regarding the fourth quarter and also the guidance. On the quarter can you share with us, outside of the Southeast Asia regions, how much is the Free Fire now contribute?

And then regarding in terms of the guidance, I think how confident are you and then what sort of scenario that you are baking in to come out with the guidance, in more detail? What I mean is, can you share with us is this coming from the gross (ph) billing and obviously the deferred that you have, and then also you assuming Free Fire will continue to improve, right on the user front and also the monetization? And then also if you can give some color on the QQC (ph) that will be helpful?

Then second question is on e-commerce, also wanted to follow up, realize at this time you guys are giving the adjusted revenue guidance rather than the GMV which I think is indicative of your much more confidence in terms of the monetization. But then, could you share with us maybe the implied GMV guidance from the net revenue guidance that you have?

And also if you can also give a little bit color in terms of let's say the growth rate on revenue, on e-commerce, if we were to rank by country, as they come from, let's say, Indonesia or other country, if you can kind of give us some color in terms of the ranking on terms of the growth rate, that will be helpful? Thank you.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Okay, thank you, Alicia. So let's start on the digital entertainment thing, so outside of the core markets right of Southeast Asia and Taiwan, we actually disclosed that in terms of, like our revenue -- adjusted revenue coming in from our global emerging markets, so I mean outside of that core region, it was 28% in the fourth quarter.

So -- and then when we are talking about things such as the overall scenario that we mapped out in terms of the new guidance for 2019, it comes down to a combination of factors. First of all, in terms of continued success on the Free Fire front, I think that's true. We have already started very successfully converting a lot of the free users becoming paying users, but at the same time there we believe that there is also some optimization work that can happen in terms of trying to upscale the amount of ARPU, or the average revenue per paying user on the Free Fire front.

At the same time, keep in mind that our publishing efforts continue to be very robust and that has materialized, most recently in terms of PUBG Elite. At the same time, we also have a very strong pipeline of games coming in from our right of first refusal arrangement with Tencent, again culminating in Speed Drifters. I would say that in combination to all of these different growth factors, we also have our own self development studio. In terms of 200 developers that we have in our studio, all of them have continued to work, not just in terms of building new content for Free Fire but also they are experimenting with new genres, new features, new game titles. So we are quite optimistic about the fact that we continue to have a very robust pipeline that will fuel growth looking forward.

If we think about -- shifting gears to the e-commerce side of things, implied GMV guidance you are probably -- you're right that in terms of the way how we've chosen to guide, in 2019, we are focusing very much in terms of adjusted revenues and we paint a picture of landing between $630 million to $660 million for the year. We believe that, that's a pretty direct indicator of overall performance of e-commerce businesses. As a result, we've chosen to guide on that.

We probably won't provide guidance in regard to GMV per se, but we continue to report it, just as we have during this quarter. Unfortunately we can't dive too much into the specific nuances of each market, but suffice to say we are seeing continued strong robust results in terms of Indonesia. We actually on previous call, you might recall that we claimed that -- we believe we were the market leader in Indonesia by virtue of our several hundred thousand orders per day on average. And what we have done since then is we built on that leadership position and closed in at 83.8 million orders in the fourth quarter, or an average of 900,000 orders per day. For 12/12, during the December 12 festival, we actually saw 5.4 million orders coming in from Indonesia alone in that single day. So I think it's pretty safe to say, and we hope you agree, that not only are we a leader in Indonesia but we also built on that lead quite substantially.

Alicia Yap -- Citigroup -- Analyst

That's very helpful. Can I follow up, just quickly on the digital entertainment guidance. So is it fair to interpret correctly from your comments just now that you have baked in PUBG LITE and also some new games that you are planning in the rest of the year from the Tencent portfolio? Thank you.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

That is correct. Alicia. It's pretty much a holistic view of the performance of our digital entertainment effort.

Alicia Yap -- Citigroup -- Analyst

Okay, thank you, congrats again.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

And our next questioner today will be Mike Olson with Piper Jaffray. Please go ahead.

Mike Olson -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Hi, good morning. I was wondering if there are any additional details you can share about 2019 profitability expectations. For example, just from a high level, are your early thoughts on EBITDA for the year, for the EBITDA loss to improve or worsen in 2019 compared to 2018? And then when could we potentially expect additional self developed titles? I'm sure you're really focusing resources on Free Fire at this point, but could you provide any thoughts on the pipeline for self developed titles like will we potentially see one new self developed title in 2019 or is that more of a 2020 event? Thanks.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Great. Thanks for your question. So let's discuss first in terms of profitability for 2019. So what we have observed is really on terms of the Shopee side of things, sales and marketing has really declined, and it was like coming in from like 8.5% as a percentage of GMV, a year ago to 5.7% in the third quarter of 2018% to 5.4% most recently in the fourth quarter of 2018.

At the same time we see the twin effect on the other side of things, we see adjusted revenues as a percentage of GMV really rose to 3.7% in the fourth quarter. So we're seeing a narrowing in terms of both lines coming to this effect.

And while we can't paint a picture with regard to precisely when the Shopee business will achieve breakeven, I think the Taiwan case study actually paints a pretty good picture. When we sit there you can see the results really in terms of our Taiwan, the successful execution of the Shopee strategy in Taiwan, specifically when it was the first market we started to monetize about 2 years ago. And when we mentioned earlier that we expect Shopee to record a positive quarterly adjusted EBITDA, before the allocation of HQ costs, for the first time for us in the first quarter of 2019.

So we do believe that the greater trends of EBITDA (ph) monetization, lowering of shipping subsidies and sales and marketing expenses that we are witnessing in Taiwan. We're actually seeing a lot of that echo out into the other markets as well. So we're quite pleased and positive about that.

In terms of shifting gears to Garena, in term of self developed titles, it's pretty early to tell and we don't disclose our game pipeline for competitive reasons. But needless to say you can be assured that we are hard at work in terms of trying to develop new genres, new titles and new features for the future.

Mike Olson -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

And our next questioner today will be Varun Ahuja with Credit Suisse Singapore. Please go ahead.

Varun Ahuja -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

Yeah, hi, good morning, everyone, and congrats on a great set of numbers. First, I just wanted on the digital entertainment, can you provide little bit color on the margin front because the fourth quarter looks pretty strong margin than first quarter, you're guiding for a much better margin than the fourth quarter. So for full year, how should we think about, because your revenue guidance on digital entertainment is very strong? So how should we think about the margin profile? Any color will be helpful.

Secondly, in terms of guidance for e-commerce, can you just provide little bit color, what -- how much is product revenue, how much is marketplace revenue that you're looking at in the guidance for the revenue for e-commerce business. And if you look at your sales and marketing, you had mentioned that the absolute amount for the shipping subsidies have come off -- for the fourth quarter, but if you look at on a quarter-on-quarter basis, the sales and marketing has increased.

So it means you're spending in somewhere else, some other promotions and stuff, so just wanted to understand how much of the sales and marketing in fourth quarter is free shipping, or the subsidies on shipping front, as a percentage. Is it coming off, while the other expenses are going up, so wanted to understand that thing?

Then the number fourth is, can you talk about little bit about the fund raising if you may have to put in for Shopee? I understand there were last year comments being made that you may look at raising at the Shopee level. So, given you're burning not burning you're investing cash every quarter which may not last beyond 2019. So any plans on that front, will be helpful. Thank you.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Varun, good morning (ph). So let's take it from the top, in terms of your first question on margins. So yes, you're right, in terms of the EBITDA margins on the digital entertainment side of things, third quarter, we had 37.2%. That has improved pretty substantially to 45.5% in the fourth quarter.

In terms of just giving more color there, it's really a combination of, we would say, three factors. First of all, just overall strong topline growth coming in from Free Fire, as well as some of the other game titles. There is also the fact that self developed games, so in this case Free Fire accounted for a greater share of revenue and that has led to an improvement in terms of EBITDA margins.

And of course, we've also seen greater efficiency in terms of our marketing efforts. And that helps just to stretch that dollar. This will be the color that we can provide in terms of EBITDA margins. In terms of e-commerce guidance, unfortunately, we probably cannot breakdown into any more granularity with regard to the guidance in terms of marketplace product versus product revenue. But that's something that we disclose in our earnings. So if we look at the composition of the fourth quarter particularly, if we look at where we end up with %126.9 million, roughly $87.6 million was marketplace and roughly 39.3% was product.

In terms of the sales and marketing, let me try to contextualize and frame your question. So if we look at it from a big picture kind of view, sales and marketing overall as a percentage of GMV fell from 5.7% in the previous quarter, the 5.4% in the fourth quarter. And something else that we said with the sales and marketing in terms of absolute dollars, we expect that to trend down this year.

And part of our ability to do that really stems from the fact that we are now the market leader. We're continuing to get outsized benefits from the flywheel effects where more and more buyers inside the block with the Shopee ecosystem, what this means is actually that we get a lot in terms of organic user growth.

So we don't actually need to continue to invest as much in terms of sales and marketing in order to post very robust growth rates. One thing that you pointed out, particularly on this question was that shipping subsidies, what we'll see here the shipping subsidies have ready fallen in terms of absolute dollar terms, if we look at the fourth quarter relative to the third quarter.

But keep in mind that although we've pulled that back at the same time GMV grew by 27% quarter-on-quarter and orders grew by 31% quarter-on-quarter. This really proves that we can grow with increasing efficiency and you're right, we have redeployed some of that budget toward more discretionary type of marketing activities, but over time what we found is that initially when buyers are a bit less well acquainted with any particular e-commerce platform perhaps frees hipping or subsidized shipping becomes an important tool for them to try out the platform for the first time.

Now when you are in a position where Shopee is, where people are very familiar with you then other factors become very important, things like product assortment, ease of discovery, deeper engagement and very high quality fulfillment and customer service, all of which are pretty much hallmarks of the Shopee experience.

And then finally in terms of your question on fund raising, as of the end of the fourth quarter we have over $1 billion in cash and cash equivalents. We are very encouraged by our most recent results in terms of Shopee. At the same time, we also have Garena, it continues to exceed our expectations. We have great accomplishment on the adjusted revenue front, with over $661 million in 2018. We think all of this puts us in a very, very strong position.

At the same time as a management team, we are very committed to growing our business and market leadership and what we think is a very large and attractive market opportunity. To that end, we will continue to evaluate our fund raising option and may access the capital markets as appropriate.

Varun Ahuja -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Thank you. And our next questioner today will be Conrad Werner with Macquarie. Please go ahead.

Conrad Werner -- Macquarie Securities -- Analyst

Hi, there. Thanks, it's Conrad from Macquarie. First question is just in the past -- and I'm sorry if you already disclosed this, you also mentioned what percentage of adjusted revenues in the games business was directly coming from Free Fire. So I'm wondering if you could provide that again. And then just a follow-up on some of the previous questions. I mean, everything in the results looks great.

I think the market would still have that one outstanding question around the cadence of EBITDA losses in the e-commerce business. Would it be fair to say that the fourth quarter EBITDA loss might represent a high watermark going forward on a quarterly basis, given all of the positive revenue trends that you're calling for, plus some of the efficiency that we're seeing on the sales and marketing side, at least in terms of shipping subsidies?

I think any color around that would be very useful and tied to that. Is there any seasonality to expect in the business? I mean you had a couple of big sales events in the fourth quarter for the e-commerce business, they were very successful, does that sort of impact the quarter-over-quarter trends in the first quarter for e-commerce.

And then just lastly on the shareholders' equity, is there a plan or a need from your perspective to move that more into a positive number over the course of 2019 and how would you do that? Thank you.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Hey Conrad, thanks for your question. So your first question is on the percentage of adjusted revenue from Free Fire. Yes, we did disclose this. We said that for the fourth quarter. It accounted for 45 -- excuse me, 44.5% of adjusted results.

Conrad Werner -- Macquarie Securities -- Analyst

Sorry, missed that, thanks.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. It's great. So the second one is in terms of the cadence of EBITDA losses. Would it be fair to say fourth quarter EBITDA losses represents a watermark in our in terms of EBITDA losses. I think that it's fair to characterize it that way. If we think about what we've disclosed. We've kind of said that we expect overall sales and marketing in terms of absolute dollars to continue to trend down starting from this year. So I think that characterization is accurate.

The third question on seasonality, I think that's true. We have seen quite an outsized response in terms of great consumer demand leading in from our 10/10, 11/11 and 12/12 festivals. And so like there is some in places (ph) and that would be in the e-commerce business, just as there is as well for the games business. Now coming to the shareholders equity question perhaps I'll let Tony weigh in on this.

Tony Hou -- Group Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. So you well pointed out, and as shared by Howard earlier, we have $1 billion on the balance sheet of net cash and we have seen very strong performance in our game business and also strong pickup in our e-commerce business as well. And meanwhile, as we shared, we are open-minded about the option and are closely monitoring the market position.

Conrad Werner -- Macquarie Securities -- Analyst

Thanks for that. Maybe just a follow-up on the seasonality question. I mean, given the strong just organic growth in this business, even with the seasonality, should we still expect the revenue metrics to be up sequentially in the first quarter just by not as much, or is there a chance that we could see them come down sequentially, before they start rising again over the course of 2019. Thank you.

Tony Hou -- Group Chief Financial Officer

And the expectation is that it will rise and that is also reflected in our adjusted revenue guidance for the year.

Conrad Werner -- Macquarie Securities -- Analyst

And that applies to the first quarter as well.

Tony Hou -- Group Chief Financial Officer

That's right.

Conrad Werner -- Macquarie Securities -- Analyst

Thank you so much.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our next questioner will be John Blackledge with Cowen. Please go ahead.

Bill -- Cowen -- Analyst

Hi, this is Bill on for John. Congrats on the strong quarter and thanks for the questions. I had a couple, if I could. Just tell us little bit more about what you see as the drivers of GMV and monetization in the first quarter. And then just a little bit more color on the logistics services and value-added services, how those performed versus your expectations. And what you kind of see as the long-term view for those businesses over the next few years. Thank you.

Howard Soh -- Director of Corporate Development and Strategy

Bill, thanks for your question. So in terms of the e-commerce drivers of GMV and monetization, couple of things to say here. I think that when I was asked on the previous call, what accounted for the great GMV acceleration in third quarter, I kind of said that Shopee is really coming to its own as the number one e-commerce platform in the region. And I think that's more true today even as short as three months ago. If we just look at the fact, moving from $0 of GMV to over $10 billion of GMV inventory timeframe, our success in terms of Indonesia where we had 900,000 orders per day.

And when -- I need to declare that we were the most downloaded app in the shopping category in Southeast Asia and Taiwan for the entire of 2018. I think all of this provides really strong evidence that we are the number one player in Indonesia, in Taiwan, and the region as a whole. if we think about our ability to continue to monetize, there are number of key drivers behind this growth. First of all, Shopee continues to experience robust platform growth and we've expanded our leadership position across the region and market by market.

Secondly, we are observing a deepening of user engagement on the platform, as we continue to enhance our service offerings to both buyers and sellers lead to a wide assortment of our service offerings, as well as innovative gamification elements, other tools and value-added services. But we are not rolling out the full spectrum of monetization avenues since January this year, and we plan to continue rolling out even more of these over the course of 2019.

For example, we recently rolled out commissions for more sellers in Thailand and Indonesia, and we've rolled out handling fees across multiple markets. So looking ahead, we continue to grow the offering (ph) with efficiency on the e-commerce front. We will leverage our organic user acquisition opportunity and will wrap up monetization, as we deepen our engagement with both buyers and sellers.

In terms of your question on VAS, it's pretty much performing in line with our expectations. As you can imagine, it is -- we are really solving a fundamental need here that has been unaddressed by -- largely unaddressed by any sort of player in our region. So you can imagine there has been outsize demand coming in for those value added services that we provide.

Bill -- Cowen -- Analyst

Okay, great, thank you so much.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) And our next questioner will be Andrew Orchard with Nomura. Please go ahead.

Andrew Orchard -- Nomura -- Analyst

Hi guys, thanks for taking my question. Question on e-commerce, can you give us some color on what percentage of your orders is from organic lead generation, and how much is coming from affiliate websites such as ISA (ph) or other websites. And then on the gaming front, can you give us some color on where you expect the split between self developed and non-self developed games to be eventually, maybe not necessarily for this year but how do you view (ph) it at some point. These are my two questions. Thanks.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Andrew. So we probably can't provide more color in terms of the exact split in terms of orders. What we will say is that we've got -- we're very pleased in terms of the overall trajectory of our orders. We see an acceleration in terms of orders and going from zero to more than 600 million orders in a timeframe of three years, we think is a pretty remarkable accomplishment.

On the other hand, when we talk about the split between self developed and non-self developed games, recall during one of the previous calls, we actually did paint a picture where we said, about 50% of that's going to come in from self developed games and 50% of that is going to be published. What we've seen on Free Fire side particularly is that now Free Fire ready accounts for 44.5% of our total assets for the fourth quarter.

So we're well on our way to -- with those targets.

Andrew Orchard -- Nomura -- Analyst

You think that it might exceed that more significantly if you ever get to a stage where you maybe 60-40 or by 65-35.

Howard Soh -- Director of Corporate Development and Strategy

We do think that's possible. And we wouldn't necessarily say that, that's negative, given the fact that it is -- our self developed title it does lead to better EBITDA margins for the business and we've seen how that has been a real -- has really resonated with a global audience. We are seeing how it's done really well, not just in our core market, but also across all sorts of different markets such as India, where it continues to get a very strong user base.

Andrew Orchard -- Nomura -- Analyst

Okay, thank you.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) And our next questioner today will be Conrad Werner with Macquarie. Please go ahead.

Conrad Werner -- Macquarie Securities -- Analyst

Sorry for the follow-up. But just to follow up on that previous question around the additional color, around the monetization and e-commerce. Is it fair to say that the guidance for 2019 it still does not assume much in terms of commissions outside of the mall business. In other words, the commissions of the marketplace business would be sort of something that happens in 2020 and beyond or are you already assuming some of that in 2019?

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Thanks Conrad. So we are assuming some of that occurring. So it will be different levers that we activate in different markets. We had to almost take it on a market by market basis. But what you're seeing in terms of the guidance for 2019, adjusted revenues for e-commerce that's an all-in holistic view in terms of all the different monetization levels that we will pursue for the year.

Andrew Orchard -- Nomura -- Analyst

Okay, thanks, and sorry again if I missed this before, was there a split provided between PC and mobile-adjusted revenues in the release or is it possible to get that on this call?

Tony Hou -- Group Chief Financial Officer

Yes it was provided so...

Conrad Werner -- Macquarie Securities -- Analyst

Okay, I'll look it up there.

Tony Hou -- Group Chief Financial Officer

It's just 85.1%, just for your quicker reference.

Conrad Werner -- Macquarie Securities -- Analyst

Thanks. Sorry I was late to look at the release. Thanks.

Operator

And our next questioner today will be Miang Chuen Koh with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Miang Chuen Koh -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Hi, couple of follow up as well. On Free Fire, can you elaborate a bit more on what sort of monetization tools you actually deployed in fourth quarter and how should we think about those monetization tools this year as well? I know you mentioned of course deepening debt, but I just would like some specifics. And as you go into orders -- or see great success in orders global markets, Latin America et cetera, would you be expanding our adding headcount in those areas as well?

And are there other geographies that you see similar opportunities besides Latin America? And then finally, should we expect a few more games from Tencent? I guess this year as well.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Thank you. All right, great, thanks, Miang Chuen. So first question in terms of monetization tools and deployed in the fourth quarter on the Free Fire front. Recall that the one of the most effective tools in terms of us converting free users to paying users has really been the subscription process that pushed up. So this subscription process, they are very affordable and in terms of like the transition from being a free user, becoming a paying user, it's very, very low ticket, being about an average of $5 per month.

If there is a lot of repeat behavior in terms of being a subscription type of tool and it gives you access to a whole host of content that you wouldn't otherwise get as a free users. So that's been a very attractive pool and once individuals start investing in the game then is a higher propensity for them to participate in other avenues such as buying costumes and skins and so on.

One thing that I will mention is that the subscription process are also team based. So we tend to push out monthly sort of teams around the subscription partners and that leads to a lot of opportunities for deeper localization and engagement with users. In terms of success in global markets and if we are seeing any sort of other countries, yeah I question -- your next couple of questions are kind of interrelated. S

o we will say that we've seen a lot of great success in terms of our initial foray into Latin America but at the same time we are seeing great user traction and Group numbers in markets like India, Russia, Turkey. According to App Annie for throughout the month of January Free Fire, was consistently ranked at the to three grossing action game on the Google Play Store in India and Russia and within the top six grossing action game on the Google play store in 30.

So we believe that Free Fire's unique position as a premium battle royal title, which is optimized for emerging market users has allowed the game to achieve popularity and success in other global markets, as well. Does this lead to an investment in terms of on the ground infrastructure and personnel, Sure, we will make those investments in order to make sure that we deliver the best game experience to our users.

Miang Chuen Koh -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Yes, and then will we expect more Tencent games as well, besides Speed Drifters for the remainder of the year?

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Sure. So I think the short answer is to you is stay tuned in terms of our announcements. We obviously can't speak about our game pipeline, but where we're quite excited about what we see where we look across the Tencent portfolio.

Miang Chuen Koh -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Got it. Thank you very much.

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

And this will conclude our question and answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Howard Soh, for any closing remarks.

Howard Soh -- Director of Corporate Development and Strategy

Thank you very much everyone for your time. We look forward to speaking with you again on the next call.

Operator

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation and you may now disconnect your lines.

Duration: 54 minutes

Call participants:

Howard Soh -- Director of Corporate Development and Strategy

Forrest Xiaodong Li -- Chairman and Group Chief Executive Officer

Tony Hou -- Group Chief Financial Officer

Miang Chuen Koh -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst

Alicia Yap -- Citigroup -- Analyst

Mike Olson -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Varun Ahuja -- Credit Suisse -- Analyst

Conrad Werner -- Macquarie Securities -- Analyst

Bill -- Cowen -- Analyst

Andrew Orchard -- Nomura -- Analyst

More SE analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

QUALCOMM, Inc. (QCOM) Stake Decreased by FineMark National Bank & Trust

FineMark National Bank & Trust lessened its holdings in shares of QUALCOMM, Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM) by 19.0% during the 4th quarter, HoldingsChannel reports. The firm owned 7,149 shares of the wireless technology company’s stock after selling 1,675 shares during the period. FineMark National Bank & Trust’s holdings in QUALCOMM were worth $407,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

Several other large investors have also added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Lavaca Capital LLC acquired a new position in shares of QUALCOMM during the 4th quarter worth approximately $25,000. Csenge Advisory Group acquired a new position in shares of QUALCOMM during the 3rd quarter worth approximately $28,000. Transamerica Financial Advisors Inc. increased its position in shares of QUALCOMM by 688.5% during the 4th quarter. Transamerica Financial Advisors Inc. now owns 615 shares of the wireless technology company’s stock worth $35,000 after purchasing an additional 537 shares during the last quarter. Essex Savings Bank acquired a new position in shares of QUALCOMM during the 4th quarter worth approximately $48,000. Finally, Hartford Financial Management Inc. increased its position in shares of QUALCOMM by 81.8% during the 4th quarter. Hartford Financial Management Inc. now owns 1,000 shares of the wireless technology company’s stock worth $57,000 after purchasing an additional 450 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 87.69% of the company’s stock.

Get QUALCOMM alerts:

QCOM has been the topic of several recent analyst reports. Bank of America lowered QUALCOMM from a “buy” rating to a “neutral” rating and set a $70.00 price target on the stock. in a research report on Wednesday, October 31st. UBS Group lifted their target price on QUALCOMM from $62.00 to $67.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a research note on Monday, November 5th. ValuEngine downgraded QUALCOMM from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Tuesday, November 6th. BidaskClub downgraded QUALCOMM from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note on Thursday, November 8th. Finally, Cowen reduced their target price on QUALCOMM from $80.00 to $73.00 and set an “outperform” rating for the company in a research note on Thursday, November 8th. Two analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, eleven have given a hold rating and twelve have given a buy rating to the company’s stock. The company currently has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus price target of $66.00.

QCOM opened at $52.99 on Tuesday. The firm has a market capitalization of $64.29 billion, a P/E ratio of 16.61, a PEG ratio of 1.67 and a beta of 1.17. QUALCOMM, Inc. has a 1 year low of $48.56 and a 1 year high of $76.50. The company has a quick ratio of 1.38, a current ratio of 1.54 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.25.

QUALCOMM (NASDAQ:QCOM) last released its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, January 30th. The wireless technology company reported $1.20 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating the Thomson Reuters’ consensus estimate of $1.09 by $0.11. The business had revenue of $4.80 billion during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $4.89 billion. QUALCOMM had a return on equity of 36.66% and a net margin of 10.03%. The firm’s quarterly revenue was down 21.3% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period in the previous year, the company posted $0.98 EPS. On average, research analysts expect that QUALCOMM, Inc. will post 3.23 EPS for the current fiscal year.

The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, March 28th. Investors of record on Thursday, March 7th will be paid a $0.62 dividend. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Wednesday, March 6th. This represents a $2.48 annualized dividend and a yield of 4.68%. QUALCOMM’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently 77.74%.

In other news, President Cristiano R. Amon sold 18,323 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Monday, December 3rd. The stock was sold at an average price of $60.23, for a total transaction of $1,103,594.29. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this hyperlink. Also, EVP James H. Thompson sold 40,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Monday, February 11th. The shares were sold at an average price of $50.75, for a total value of $2,030,000.00. Following the sale, the executive vice president now owns 62,301 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $3,161,775.75. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders sold a total of 67,371 shares of company stock valued at $3,658,469 over the last 90 days. 0.11% of the stock is currently owned by corporate insiders.

TRADEMARK VIOLATION NOTICE: “QUALCOMM, Inc. (QCOM) Stake Decreased by FineMark National Bank & Trust” was originally published by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are reading this piece on another website, it was illegally stolen and republished in violation of US & international copyright & trademark laws. The legal version of this piece can be read at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4180072/qualcomm-inc-qcom-stake-decreased-by-finemark-national-bank-trust.html.

QUALCOMM Profile

QUALCOMM Incorporated designs, develops, manufactures, and markets digital communication products worldwide. It operates through three segments: Qualcomm CDMA Technologies (QCT); Qualcomm Technology Licensing (QTL); and Qualcomm Strategic Initiatives (QSI). The QCT segment develops and supplies integrated circuits and system software based on code division multiple access (CDMA), orthogonal frequency division multiple access, and other technologies for use in wireless voice and data communications, networking, application processing, multimedia, and global positioning system products.

Featured Story: How is the S&P 500 index different from the DJIA?

Want to see what other hedge funds are holding QCOM? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for QUALCOMM, Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM).

Institutional Ownership by Quarter for QUALCOMM (NASDAQ:QCOM)

Sunday, February 24, 2019

Globus Medical (GMED) Releases FY 2019 Earnings Guidance

Globus Medical (NYSE:GMED) issued an update on its FY 2019 earnings guidance on Thursday morning. The company provided earnings per share (EPS) guidance of $1.72-1.72 for the period, compared to the Thomson Reuters consensus estimate of $1.72. The company issued revenue guidance of $770-770 million, compared to the consensus revenue estimate of $766.1 million.

NYSE GMED traded up $0.09 during midday trading on Thursday, hitting $47.69. The company had a trading volume of 374,300 shares, compared to its average volume of 755,306. The firm has a market capitalization of $4.70 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 36.40, a P/E/G ratio of 2.26 and a beta of 0.82. Globus Medical has a fifty-two week low of $38.01 and a fifty-two week high of $57.83.

Get Globus Medical alerts:

Several analysts have issued reports on GMED shares. Morgan Stanley lowered shares of Globus Medical from an overweight rating to an equal weight rating and decreased their price target for the stock from $64.00 to $49.00 in a research report on Wednesday, January 2nd. ValuEngine lowered shares of Globus Medical from a strong-buy rating to a buy rating in a research report on Wednesday, November 28th. Cantor Fitzgerald set a $60.00 price target on shares of Globus Medical and gave the stock a buy rating in a research report on Friday, January 18th. Zacks Investment Research lowered shares of Globus Medical from a buy rating to a hold rating in a research report on Tuesday, January 8th. Finally, UBS Group began coverage on shares of Globus Medical in a research report on Wednesday, November 28th. They set a neutral rating and a $55.00 target price on the stock. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, five have given a hold rating and seven have assigned a buy rating to the stock. The stock presently has a consensus rating of Hold and an average price target of $56.08.

TRADEMARK VIOLATION NOTICE: “Globus Medical (GMED) Releases FY 2019 Earnings Guidance” was posted by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are accessing this news story on another domain, it was copied illegally and republished in violation of U.S. and international copyright & trademark legislation. The correct version of this news story can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4169557/globus-medical-gmed-releases-fy-2019-earnings-guidance.html.

Globus Medical Company Profile

Globus Medical, Inc, a medical device company, focuses on the design, development, and commercialization of musculoskeletal implants that promote healing in patients with spine disorders. The company offers products that address an array of spinal pathologies, anatomies, and surgical approaches. Its fusion products include a range of implant and surgical approach options to treat degenerative, deformity, tumor, and trauma conditions along the spine from the occiput to the sacrum.

See Also: How are Outstanding Shares Different from Authorized Shares?

Earnings History and Estimates for Globus Medical (NYSE:GMED)

Saturday, February 23, 2019

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Invest In Right Now

tags:NYMT,EGLE,AIM,ATAX,TSN, &l;p&g;&l;img class=&q;size-full wp-image-5157&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/davidseideman/files/2018/05/fivemantles__1527035001_36176.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;&q; data-height=&q;495&q; data-width=&q;660&q;&g; Five 1952 Topps Mantles and four Jackie Robinsons.

&l;/p&g;&l;p class=&q;p2&q;&g;In the early 1950s, baseball allegiances in Hartford, CT split the town in two. West Hartford was Yankees Country; East Hartford was Red Sox.&l;/p&g;

&l;p class=&q;p2&q;&g;&l;span class=&q;s1&q;&g;A little boy in West Hartford named John made two brilliant business decisions tantamount to jumping on Berkshire Hathaway&a;rsquo;s IPO in 1964.&l;span class=&q;Apple-converted-space&q;&g;&a;nbsp; &l;/span&g;First, he bought hundreds of 1951 Bowman and 1952 Topps cards for a penny apiece and kept all his beloved Yankees. (He loved the bubble gum the most.) Second, he traded all his Red Sox cards to collectors in East Hartford for Yankees.&l;/span&g;&l;/p&g;

&l;p class=&q;p2&q;&g;&l;span class=&q;s1&q;&g;Out went the Ted Williams and Hoot Evers cards and in came a multitude of Yankees, particularly a rising young star named Mickey Mantle. To be precise, &l;b&g;five &l;/b&g;1952 Topps Mantles, all in superb condition. The Mantle card is the most popular baseball card in history and by far the most valuable post-war one.&l;/span&g;&l;/p&g;

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Invest In Right Now: New York Mortgage Trust Inc.(NYMT)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Motley Fool Transcribers]

    New York Mortgage Trust Inc  (NASDAQ:NYMT)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 22, 2019, 9:00 a.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    NY MTG TR INC/SH (NASDAQ:NYMT) has been given a consensus recommendation of “Hold” by the seven research firms that are covering the company, MarketBeat reports. Five investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, one has assigned a buy rating and one has assigned a strong buy rating to the company. The average twelve-month price target among brokerages that have issued a report on the stock in the last year is $6.38.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Bank of New York Mellon Corp cut its position in shares of NY Mtg Tr Inc/SH (NASDAQ:NYMT) by 2.1% during the 2nd quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the SEC. The firm owned 1,265,207 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock after selling 27,565 shares during the quarter. Bank of New York Mellon Corp owned 1.13% of NY Mtg Tr Inc/SH worth $7,604,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Invest In Right Now: Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc.(EGLE)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (NASDAQ:EGLE) major shareholder Goldentree Asset Management Lp acquired 84,969 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Monday, February 11th. The shares were bought at an average cost of $4.02 per share, for a total transaction of $341,575.38. The acquisition was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available at this link. Large shareholders that own at least 10% of a company’s shares are required to disclose their transactions with the SEC.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Several brokerages have updated their recommendations and price targets on shares of Eagle Bulk Shipping (NASDAQ: EGLE) in the last few weeks:

    7/2/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was downgraded by analysts at ValuEngine from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating. 6/28/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was downgraded by analysts at BidaskClub from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating. 6/18/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping is now covered by analysts at Morgan Stanley. They set an “equal weight” rating and a $6.50 price target on the stock. 6/18/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping is now covered by analysts at DNB Markets. They set a “buy” rating on the stock. 6/12/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was downgraded by analysts at BidaskClub from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating. 6/2/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was upgraded by analysts at BidaskClub from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating. 6/2/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was upgraded by analysts at ValuEngine from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating. 5/29/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping is now covered by analysts at Evercore ISI. They set an “outperform” rating and a $7.50 price target on the stock. 5/15/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was upgraded by analysts at Zacks Investment Research from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating. According to Zacks, “Eagle Bulk Shipping is the largest U.S. based owner of Handymax dry bulk vessels. Handymax dry bulk vessels range in size from 35,000 to 60,000 deadweight tons, or dwt, and transport a broad range of major and minor bulk cargoes, including iron ore, coal, grain, cement and fertilizer, along worldwide shipping routes. “ 5/9/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping had its “hold” rating reaffirmed by analysts at Maxim Group. They now have a $6.00 price target on the

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Invest In Right Now: Aerosonic Corporation(AIM)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Aimia (TSE:AIM) has earned an average rating of “Hold” from the seven research firms that are currently covering the company, MarketBeat.com reports. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell recommendation, four have assigned a hold recommendation and one has given a buy recommendation to the company. The average 1-year price target among analysts that have issued a report on the stock in the last year is C$2.67.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Shares of Aimia Inc (TSE:AIM) have earned a consensus rating of “Hold” from the seven research firms that are currently covering the company, Marketbeat reports. Two analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, three have issued a hold rating and one has issued a buy rating on the company. The average 1 year price target among brokers that have covered the stock in the last year is C$3.54.

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Invest In Right Now: America First Tax Exempt Investors L.P.(ATAX)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Shares of America First Tax Exempt Investors, L.P. (NASDAQ:ATAX) hit a new 52-week high and low during mid-day trading on Monday . The company traded as low as $6.47 and last traded at $6.43, with a volume of 54800 shares changing hands. The stock had previously closed at $6.43.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on America First Multifamily Investors (ATAX)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    BidaskClub upgraded shares of America First Multifamily Investors (NASDAQ:ATAX) from a strong sell rating to a sell rating in a research report sent to investors on Thursday morning.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    America First Multifamily Investors LP (NASDAQ:ATAX) announced a quarterly dividend on Friday, September 14th, Wall Street Journal reports. Stockholders of record on Friday, September 28th will be given a dividend of 0.125 per share by the financial services provider on Wednesday, October 31st. This represents a $0.50 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 8.50%. The ex-dividend date is Thursday, September 27th.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    America First Multifamily Investors LP (NASDAQ:ATAX) Director Lisa Y. Roskens bought 5,965 shares of the stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, August 27th. The shares were purchased at an average price of $5.95 per share, for a total transaction of $35,491.75. Following the purchase, the director now owns 100,069 shares in the company, valued at approximately $595,410.55. The acquisition was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which can be accessed through this link.

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Invest In Right Now: Tyson Foods Inc.(TSN)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Garrett Baldwin]

    By submitting your email address you will receive a free subscription to Profit Alerts and occasional special offers from Money Map Press and our affiliates. You can unsubscribe at anytime and we encourage you to read more about our privacy policy.

    Shares of GoPro Inc. (NASDAQ: GPRO) added 2.2% after the company reported earnings after the bell and said that it is on a path to profitability. However, to get into the black, the firm had to cut several hundred employees to keep operating expenses below $400 million. Shares of Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. (NYSE: CMG) popped more than 10% after the company blew out earnings expectations after the bell yesterday. The company's ongoing turnaround has produced a big uptick in consumer foot traffic. The firm reported EPS of $1.72, well above the $1.37 per share. Revenue came in at $1.23 billion and topped expectations, as did same-store growth at 6.1%. Look for other earnings reports from ANGI HomeServices Inc. (NASDAQ: ANGI), ArcelorMittal SA (NYSE: MT), Cardinal Health Inc. (NYSE: CAH), Dunkin' Brands Group Inc. (NASDAQ: DNKN), Expedia Group Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE), GrubHub Inc. (NASDAQ: GRUB), IAC/InterActiveCorp. (NYSE: IAC), Kellogg Co. (NYSE: K), Macerich Co. (NYSE: MAC), Mattel Inc. (NYSE: MAT), News Corp. (NASDAQ: NWSA), Penn National Gaming Inc. (NASDAQ: PENN), Sanofi SA (NYSE: SNY), Tyson Foods Inc. (NYSE: TSN), World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. (NYSE: WWE), and Yum! Brands Inc. (NYSE: YUM). These 3 Stocks Are the Key to 2019's Greatest Profits

    The 2018 midterm election was a turning point for the cannabis industry.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Franklin Resources Inc. cut its holdings in shares of Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) by 88.7% during the first quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The firm owned 58,511 shares of the company’s stock after selling 460,578 shares during the quarter. Franklin Resources Inc.’s holdings in Tyson Foods were worth $4,283,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Victory Capital Management Inc. decreased its stake in shares of Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) by 71.4% during the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The fund owned 53,867 shares of the company’s stock after selling 134,550 shares during the quarter. Victory Capital Management Inc.’s holdings in Tyson Foods were worth $3,709,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) – Analysts at Piper Jaffray Companies lowered their Q2 2019 EPS estimates for Tyson Foods in a note issued to investors on Thursday, February 7th. Piper Jaffray Companies analyst M. Lavery now anticipates that the company will post earnings per share of $1.22 for the quarter, down from their prior estimate of $1.35. Piper Jaffray Companies currently has a “Buy” rating and a $72.00 target price on the stock. Piper Jaffray Companies also issued estimates for Tyson Foods’ Q3 2019 earnings at $1.56 EPS, Q4 2019 earnings at $1.63 EPS, FY2019 earnings at $6.00 EPS, Q1 2020 earnings at $1.79 EPS, Q2 2020 earnings at $1.51 EPS, Q3 2020 earnings at $1.76 EPS, Q4 2020 earnings at $1.76 EPS, FY2020 earnings at $6.82 EPS and FY2021 earnings at $7.36 EPS.

  • [By Chris Lange]

    Tyson Foods Inc. (NYSE: TSN) announced early on Monday that it had reached a definitive agreement to acquire the Keystone Foods business from Marfrig Global Foods. The transaction is all in cash and is valued at $2.16 billion. The deal is expected to close in mid-fiscal 2019.

  • [By ]

    In the Lightning Round, Cramer was bullish on T-Mobile US (TMUS) , Lennar (LEN) , Toll Brothers (TOL) , Tyson Foods (TSN) , JB Hunt Transport Services (JBHT) and International Paper (IP) .

Friday, February 22, 2019

Dynamic (DYN) Trading Down 6.5% This Week

Dynamic (CURRENCY:DYN) traded down 5.9% against the dollar during the 24 hour period ending at 16:00 PM E.T. on February 21st. Dynamic has a market cap of $624,529.00 and $3,092.00 worth of Dynamic was traded on exchanges in the last day. During the last seven days, Dynamic has traded down 6.5% against the dollar. One Dynamic coin can now be bought for about $0.20 or 0.00004936 BTC on exchanges including Upbit and Bittrex.

Here’s how other cryptocurrencies have performed during the last day:

Get Dynamic alerts: Bitcoin (BTC) traded 0.9% lower against the dollar and now trades at $3,950.47 or 1.00000000 BTC. Ethereum (ETH) traded 1.4% lower against the dollar and now trades at $145.65 or 0.03684977 BTC. Litecoin (LTC) traded down 4.1% against the dollar and now trades at $49.21 or 0.01244879 BTC. Bitcoin Cash (BCH) traded 2.9% lower against the dollar and now trades at $142.48 or 0.03604595 BTC. Monero (XMR) traded down 2.8% against the dollar and now trades at $50.34 or 0.01273576 BTC. Ethereum Classic (ETC) traded 3.5% lower against the dollar and now trades at $4.47 or 0.00113031 BTC. Zcash (ZEC) traded down 2.3% against the dollar and now trades at $53.47 or 0.01352747 BTC. Dogecoin (DOGE) traded down 2% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0020 or 0.00000051 BTC. Bitcoin Gold (BTG) traded up 0.3% against the dollar and now trades at $12.58 or 0.00318185 BTC. Bytecoin (BCN) traded down 2.1% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0007 or 0.00000017 BTC.

Dynamic Profile

Dynamic is a proof-of-work (PoW) coin that uses the Argon2 hashing algorithm. Its genesis date was May 5th, 2017. Dynamic’s total supply is 14,394,059 coins and its circulating supply is 3,200,906 coins. The official website for Dynamic is duality.solutions. Dynamic’s official Twitter account is @dualitychain and its Facebook page is accessible here.

Buying and Selling Dynamic

Dynamic can be purchased on these cryptocurrency exchanges: Bittrex and Upbit. It is usually not currently possible to buy alternative cryptocurrencies such as Dynamic directly using US dollars. Investors seeking to trade Dynamic should first buy Bitcoin or Ethereum using an exchange that deals in US dollars such as Coinbase, Changelly or GDAX. Investors can then use their newly-acquired Bitcoin or Ethereum to buy Dynamic using one of the aforementioned exchanges.

new TradingView.widget({ “height”: 400, “width”: 650, “symbol”: “DYNUSD”, “interval”: “D”, “timezone”: “Etc/UTC”, “theme”: “White”, “style”: “1”, “locale”: “en”, “toolbar_bg”: “#f1f3f6”, “enable_publishing”: false, “hideideas”: true, “referral_id”: “2588”});

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

AquaVenture Holdings Ltd (WAAS) Receives Average Recommendation of “Buy” from Brokerages

Shares of AquaVenture Holdings Ltd (NYSE:WAAS) have earned a consensus rating of “Buy” from the ten ratings firms that are currently covering the firm, MarketBeat reports. Eight investment analysts have rated the stock with a buy rating and one has issued a strong buy rating on the company. The average twelve-month target price among analysts that have updated their coverage on the stock in the last year is $25.75.

Several equities research analysts have issued reports on the company. Royal Bank of Canada lifted their price objective on AquaVenture from $21.00 to $22.00 and gave the stock an “outperform” rating in a report on Monday, November 5th. Citigroup set a $23.00 price objective on AquaVenture and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Monday, November 5th. Zacks Investment Research upgraded AquaVenture from a “hold” rating to a “strong-buy” rating and set a $24.00 price objective on the stock in a report on Saturday, January 12th. JMP Securities set a $30.00 price objective on AquaVenture and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, November 8th. Finally, Lake Street Capital lifted their price objective on AquaVenture to $34.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Wednesday, December 19th.

Get AquaVenture alerts:

Several institutional investors and hedge funds have recently modified their holdings of the company. Millennium Management LLC boosted its position in AquaVenture by 57.3% during the 4th quarter. Millennium Management LLC now owns 32,622 shares of the company’s stock valued at $616,000 after purchasing an additional 11,884 shares during the period. Bank of America Corp DE boosted its position in AquaVenture by 62.7% during the 4th quarter. Bank of America Corp DE now owns 8,698 shares of the company’s stock valued at $165,000 after purchasing an additional 3,351 shares during the period. Principal Financial Group Inc. boosted its position in AquaVenture by 4.6% during the 4th quarter. Principal Financial Group Inc. now owns 151,019 shares of the company’s stock valued at $2,853,000 after purchasing an additional 6,619 shares during the period. Geode Capital Management LLC boosted its position in AquaVenture by 10.8% during the 4th quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 127,050 shares of the company’s stock valued at $2,399,000 after purchasing an additional 12,356 shares during the period. Finally, Ibex Investors LLC acquired a new position in AquaVenture during the 4th quarter valued at approximately $218,000. Institutional investors own 33.89% of the company’s stock.

Shares of NYSE:WAAS traded up $0.18 during mid-day trading on Wednesday, hitting $21.26. 26,307 shares of the company traded hands, compared to its average volume of 70,563. The company has a market cap of $568.30 million, a P/E ratio of -21.69 and a beta of 0.79. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.48, a quick ratio of 4.64 and a current ratio of 5.00. AquaVenture has a 52-week low of $11.83 and a 52-week high of $21.62.

AquaVenture Company Profile

AquaVenture Holdings Limited provides water-as-a-service solutions in North America, the Caribbean, and South America. The company operates in two segments, Seven Seas Water and Quench. It offers desalination and wastewater treatment solutions for governmental, municipal, industrial, and hospitality customers; and point-of-use filtered water systems and related services to approximately 40,000 institutional and commercial customers.

Read More: Futures Contract

Analyst Recommendations for AquaVenture (NYSE:WAAS)

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Forget Coca-Cola: PepsiCo Is a Better Dividend Stock

Both Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) and PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) are Dividend Aristocrats, meaning they have increased their dividends for at least the last 25 consecutive years. 

Coca-Cola has paid a quarterly dividend since 1920 and has raised the payout for 55 consecutive years. Its dividend yield is currently 3.4%, which is much better than the S&P 500's dividend yield of about 2%.  

On the other side, Pepsi has paid a quarterly dividend since 1965, the year Pepsi-Cola merged with Frito-Lay to create a beverage and snack food powerhouse. The company has increased its payout in each of the last 46 years, and its dividend currently yields 3.2%. 

Despite its slightly lower dividend yield, I believe that Pepsi is the better dividend stock. Here's why.

A woman throwing dollar bills from her hand.

Image source: Getty Images.

Coke and Pepsi can still grow

A durable competitive moat is the essential ingredient of a great dividend stock. Without it, a company can run into challenges that make it difficult to deliver the consistency in operating performance that is required to support a rising dividend over time.

Both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have wide moats. In addition to their world-renowned brands, both companies have unrivaled distribution capabilities. Together, these two advantages allow Coke and Pepsi to control the lion's share of shelf space at stores, which makes Coke and Pepsi products stand out in store aisles.

The only weakness of the two beverage giants is the consumer shift away from sugary soft drinks and snack foods. Both stocks have underperformed the market over the last decade as sales growth has slowed dramatically. 

PEP Chart

PepsiCo and Coca-Cola vs. S&P 500 Stock Performance, data by YCharts.

To deal with shifting consumer preferences, both companies have been diversifying into lower-calorie products. Coke is on a mission to become a "total beverage company." In addition to Coke-branded products, the company also owns Smartwater, Powerade, and several tea and juice brands. Also, Coke recently acquired U.K.-based Costa Coffee to expand into the $500 billion hot-beverage market. 

Pepsi has followed a similar path. The company has expanded beyond its core snack food products, such as Doritos and Cheetos, with better-for-you snacks that are marketed for their lower salt and sugar content. Pepsi has a broad portfolio of beverages and snacks, and the company just acquired SodaStream, the fast-growing do-it-yourself soft drink machine maker. 

Pepsi has been diversifying its beverage and food portfolio for years. In 2006, its Fun For You category, including soft drinks, Fritos, Doritos, Lays, and Tostitos, made up 62% of total sales. By 2017, Pepsi's revenue was split about 50/50 between Fun For You items and Good For You products. The latter category includes Aquafina water, Quaker Oats, and Naked Juice. 

These strategies seem to be working well for both companies. In 2018, Coke's organic revenue increased 5%, while Pepsi boosted organic revenue by 3.7%. Even better, Coke and Pepsi expanded their profit margins in 2018, thanks to both companies' constant focus on improving operating efficiency. 

Pepsi has grown free cash flow and dividends faster

However, Pepsi has managed to grow its free cash flow faster than Coke over the last 10 years. Pepsi's free cash flow has risen 47%, while Coke's improved by 19%.

The snack giant has also been more effective at reducing its share count by repurchasing its stock. As a result, Pepsi has been able to raise its dividend faster than Coke over the last five years, as you can see in the chart below. 

PEP Dividends Paid (TTM) Chart

PepsiCo vs. Coca-Cola Dividend Growth, data by YCharts.

The payout ratio says Pepsi is the better dividend stock

Growing free cash flow and steady dividend increases are two characteristics to consider when looking for a good dividend stock. But the payout ratio is the most important metric to evaluate, and it's this metric that makes Pepsi the better dividend stock.

Over the last year, Coke paid out 111% of its free cash flow in dividends. A cash payout of more than 100% is unsustainable over the long term.

Pepsi also paid out a high percentage of free cash flow in dividends, but not as high as Coke. In 2018, Pepsi paid out 80% of its free cash flow in dividends. 

Keep in mind, both companies are undergoing major restructuring efforts to improve performance. This is putting pressure on both companies' profitability in the short term. But even based on forward projections, Coke is expected to pay out more than 100% of its free cash flow through 2019, while Pepsi's guidance calls for a dividend payout of no more than 100% of its free cash flow. 

In addition to having a lower payout ratio, Pepsi has a lower valuation than Coke. Analysts expect Coke and Pepsi to grow earnings at approximately the same rate over the next five years: 6.6% per year for Coke and 6.4% per year for Pepsi. But shares of Coke trade for 20.4 times forward earnings, compared with 19.7 times forward earnings for Pepsi stock. 

Both Coke and Pepsi should be good dividend stocks over the long term, but I believe Pepsi is likely to increase its dividend at a faster rate in the foreseeable future. For this reason, income investors may want to consider skipping Coca-Cola and buying shares of PepsiCo. 

Saturday, February 16, 2019

Schneider Electric (SU) Given a €75.00 Price Target at Royal Bank of Canada

Schneider Electric (EPA:SU) has been given a €75.00 ($87.21) price objective by analysts at Royal Bank of Canada in a research report issued to clients and investors on Thursday. The firm presently has a “buy” rating on the stock.

SU has been the subject of several other research reports. Goldman Sachs Group set a €60.00 ($69.77) target price on shares of Schneider Electric and gave the stock a “sell” rating in a research report on Tuesday, January 8th. BNP Paribas set a €65.00 ($75.58) target price on shares of Schneider Electric and gave the company a “neutral” rating in a report on Tuesday, November 27th. Credit Suisse Group set a €85.00 ($98.84) price objective on shares of Schneider Electric and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Monday, December 3rd. Berenberg Bank set a €74.00 ($86.05) target price on shares of Schneider Electric and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, November 19th. Finally, Kepler Capital Markets set a €60.00 ($69.77) price target on shares of Schneider Electric and gave the company a “neutral” rating in a report on Monday, January 14th. One analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, eight have given a hold rating and seven have assigned a buy rating to the company’s stock. The company presently has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of €71.00 ($82.56).

Get Schneider Electric alerts:

Schneider Electric has a 52-week low of €64.88 ($75.44) and a 52-week high of €76.34 ($88.77).

Schneider Electric Company Profile

Schneider Electric S.E. provides energy management and automation solutions worldwide. It operates through four businesses: Low Voltage, Medium Voltage, Industrial Automation, and Secure Power. The Low Voltage business provides low voltage power and building automation products and solutions that address the needs of various end markets from buildings to industries and infrastructure to data centers.

Featured Story: Day Trading

Analyst Recommendations for Schneider Electric (EPA:SU)

Friday, February 15, 2019

S&P 500? More Like The S&P 50

&l;img class=&q;size-full wp-image-1353&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/robisbitts2/files/2019/02/SP50.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;&q; data-height=&q;562&q; data-width=&q;1000&q;&g;&l;strong&g;The index is &a;ldquo;concentrating&a;rdquo; &a;hellip; should you leave it alone?&l;/strong&g;

&l;strong&g;&a;nbsp;&l;/strong&g;

I must admit, with all that I write about the S&a;amp;P 500 Index, it looks weird to see it without the last zero, as it is in the title of this article.&a;nbsp; But that is not as weird as the sustained predicament with that index regarding its &a;ldquo;concentration.&a;rdquo;&a;nbsp; That is, the index which holds approximately 500 stocks is essentially ignoring half of them.&a;nbsp; You see, the S&a;amp;P 500 is like many indexes (and thus the ETFs and mutual funds that track them) in that its holdings are allocated by the size of the stock (&a;ldquo;market capitalization&a;rdquo;).&a;nbsp; That means that as big companies get bigger, as the market as a whole moves higher, and as a few high-flyers emerge into &a;ldquo;hot stocks,&a;rdquo; the S&a;amp;P 500 becomes far less democratic.

&l;img class=&q;size-full wp-image-1354&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/robisbitts2/files/2019/02/F1.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;&q; data-height=&q;744&q; data-width=&q;536&q;&g;

In fact, the longer this goes on, more stocks in the index become irrelevant to the index&a;rsquo;s performance.&a;nbsp; This is not a problem&a;hellip;until it is.&a;nbsp; While the pressure of concentration builds, a few things happen:

&l;ol&g;&l;li&g;Investors get more confident that &a;ldquo;owning the market&a;rdquo; is the way to go&a;hellip;even though they own less of it than they think they do.&l;/li&g;

&l;li&g;More and more money chases the same small number of securities, which can potentially boost their valuations to nosebleed levels.&l;/li&g;

&l;li&g;The ultimate unwinding process (as this situation eventually reverses) gets more risky.&l;/li&g;

&l;li&g;Excellent opportunities outside of the concentrated segment of the S&a;amp;P 500 are either ignored or are relegated to being &a;ldquo;tactical&a;rdquo; situations only. That is, market sectors or themes that are not prominently represented in the 50 largest stocks that make up about half of the S&a;amp;P 500 may have their moments, but their prices don&a;rsquo;t get the massive, sustained push higher that occurs with the &a;ldquo;popular&a;rdquo; stocks at the top of the index.&l;/li&g;

&l;/ol&g;

I think all of these situations are present in today&a;rsquo;s market.&a;nbsp; But so, what?&a;nbsp; Until the air is let out of the bubble, prices can still go higher and higher.&a;nbsp; In fact, the possibility of an S&a;amp;P 500 &a;ldquo;melt-up&a;rdquo; is growing, following a temporary shock to the system last December.&a;nbsp; In the year 2000, this was exactly what happened for the first 9 weeks of the year.&a;nbsp; And then, subtly, the concentration-led market rally topped, faded, and then plunged.

Are there imminent signs of that?&a;nbsp; Not really.&a;nbsp; And with markets being flipped around by news and algorithmic trading, and global debt and recession potential being shrugged off with ease, who knows how extended things can get?

As the table above shows (focus on the blue rectangles, please), only 10 stocks make up the top 20% of the S&a;amp;P 500.&a;nbsp; The next 15 stocks get that figure to 26%, and the top 50 are about 50% of the index.&a;nbsp; As for the other 450 stocks?&a;nbsp; They combine to have as much impact as the top 50.&a;nbsp; That&a;rsquo;s concentration.

&l;span&g;For research and insight on these issues and more, click&a;nbsp;&l;/span&g;&l;a href=&q;http://www.sungardeninvestment.com/welcome&q; target=&q;_blank&q; rel=&q;nofollow noopener noreferrer&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;&l;span&g;HERE&l;/span&g;&l;/a&g;&l;span&g;.&l;/span&g;

&a;nbsp;

&a;nbsp;

Thursday, February 14, 2019

EmaratCoin (AEC) Price Up 1% Over Last Week

EmaratCoin (CURRENCY:AEC) traded up 2.1% against the dollar during the twenty-four hour period ending at 18:00 PM E.T. on February 14th. EmaratCoin has a total market cap of $0.00 and $22.00 worth of EmaratCoin was traded on exchanges in the last 24 hours. Over the last week, EmaratCoin has traded up 1% against the dollar. One EmaratCoin coin can now be bought for about $0.0311 or 0.00000858 BTC on popular exchanges including BiteBTC and Trade Satoshi.

Here’s how other cryptocurrencies have performed over the last 24 hours:

Get EmaratCoin alerts: BOScoin (BOS) traded 0% higher against the dollar and now trades at $0.0239 or 0.00000662 BTC. Nasdacoin (NSD) traded 1.5% lower against the dollar and now trades at $0.64 or 0.00017610 BTC. FLO (FLO) traded 3.4% higher against the dollar and now trades at $0.0547 or 0.00001513 BTC. Cashbery Coin (CBC) traded 0.4% higher against the dollar and now trades at $0.0818 or 0.00002262 BTC. Quasarcoin (QAC) traded 0.8% lower against the dollar and now trades at $0.0220 or 0.00000608 BTC. Beetle Coin (BEET) traded up 24.9% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0072 or 0.00000200 BTC. Apollon (XAP) traded down 13.7% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0019 or 0.00000054 BTC. Shard (SHARD) traded down 21.6% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0200 or 0.00000553 BTC. Bitibu Coin (BTB) traded up 2.4% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0617 or 0.00001707 BTC. Actinium (ACM) traded down 2.5% against the dollar and now trades at $0.0300 or 0.00000830 BTC.

EmaratCoin Profile

AEC is a proof-of-stake (PoS) coin that uses the

Scrypt

hashing algorithm. It was first traded on May 1st, 2016. EmaratCoin’s total supply is 21,566,490 coins. EmaratCoin’s official Twitter account is @EmaratCoin and its Facebook page is accessible here. EmaratCoin’s official website is emaratcoin.com. The official message board for EmaratCoin is emaratcoin.com/#blog.

EmaratCoin Coin Trading

EmaratCoin can be traded on these cryptocurrency exchanges: Trade Satoshi and BiteBTC. It is usually not currently possible to purchase alternative cryptocurrencies such as EmaratCoin directly using U.S. dollars. Investors seeking to acquire EmaratCoin should first purchase Ethereum or Bitcoin using an exchange that deals in U.S. dollars such as Gemini, Changelly or Coinbase. Investors can then use their newly-acquired Ethereum or Bitcoin to purchase EmaratCoin using one of the aforementioned exchanges.

new TradingView.widget({ “height”: 400, “width”: 650, “symbol”: “AECUSD”, “interval”: “D”, “timezone”: “Etc/UTC”, “theme”: “White”, “style”: “1”, “locale”: “en”, “toolbar_bg”: “#f1f3f6”, “enable_publishing”: false, “hideideas”: true, “referral_id”: “2588”});

Why Cannabis' Recent Downturn Is Nothing to Worry About

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Greg MillerGreg Miller

Here's the deal. We saw a bit of downside volatility in the NICI 50 index and in overall cannabis stocks last week.

It was the first real downdraft since the cannabis market turned up with the overall equity market in late December of 2018.

Whenever these downturns occur, I get a lot of questions from worried investors wondering what their next move should be and if things will turn back around.

In this case, the answer is simple: Cannabis is doing just fine, the overall market is driving cannabis stocks lower, and although I don't know exactly when things will turn, I know for a fact that they will.

This may not be the most satisfying answer, but it's the truth.

Let me explain just what I mean and why you shouldn't worry…

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

Greg MillerGreg Miller

About the Author

Browse Greg's articles | View Greg's research services

Greg Miller started working on Wall Street in September, 1987, just a month before the "Black Monday" stock market crash.

During his career there, he became an expert in just about every kind of publicly traded security - from blue-chip and small-cap stocks to municipals, junk bonds, and derivatives. As a portfolio manager, Greg was responsible for over $500 million of assets in mutual funds and insurance company accounts.

After leaving the Street, he designed a successful options trading strategy and made lucrative tech investments for a financial publication. He has also helped develop new products and worked with other editors to hone their strategies.  He's always been dedicated to deep, fundamental research - and he always will be - because he believes buying the very best companies at the right price is the best way to amass wealth in the stock market.

… Read full bio